CASE STUDY

Tool Design for High Productivity,
Defect Free Direct Pressed Rods with Chamfer

Direct Pressed Chamfer +40% Higher Productivity Yield ≥ 99.7%

A multi year root cause investigation and tool redesign programme that made it possible to press a durable, net shape chamfer directly onto cemented carbide rods without a separate grinding step, eliminating the dominant crack defect in axial dry pressing while raising productivity, validated across hundreds of production orders and well over a million parts.

Sintered Cemented Carbide Rods After Dry Pressing

Industry

Cemented Carbide Manufacturing

Technology

Axial Dry Pressing & Tool Design

Role

Production Technology Lead

Status

Implemented

THE CHALLENGE

A Persistent Crack Problem at the Direct Pressed Chamfer

Cemented carbide rods produced by axial dry pressing carry a pressed in chamfer, a detail that removes the need for a separate grinding step but is unforgiving to get right. Rods were suffering from cracking at exactly this chamfer, with defect rates reaching a third of output on some tooling. Every cracked part had to be scrapped after sintering, well after the material and press time had already been invested.

Rather than accepting cracks as an inherent cost of pressing a chamfer directly, the goal was to trace the defect back to its root cause in the pressing process and tooling itself, design it out, and raise productivity in the same step rather than trading one for the other.

Multi Cavity Dry Pressing Tool
ENGINEERING SCOPE

From Root Cause Analysis to Validated Tooling

The scope covered the full path from systematic root cause investigation through tool redesign to performance validation at production scale.

Root Cause Investigation

  • Punch force & ejection force analysis
  • Press position within the die (conical vs. cylindrical)
  • Powder bulk density & batch effects

Chamfer Forming Tool Redesign

  • Chamfer geometry reengineered for a clean, defect free press
  • Die pre widening length & cavity count increased for productivity
  • Explored external tooling supply chains

Performance Validation

  • Tracked across hundreds of production orders
  • Well over a million defect free parts evaluated
  • Productivity and defect cost compared, old vs. new tooling
TECHNOLOGY

Why Press Position Decides Whether the Chamfer Presses Defect Free

Pressing and ejecting a part entirely within the die's conical zone consistently produced fewer cracks than tooling that pressed or ejected across a mix of cylindrical and conical zones. The transition between the two zones, and the vibration introduced during ejection, proved to be a recurring source of edge damage.

A second mechanism was traced to the punch chamfer itself: as the punch relaxes after pressing, it can spring back and damage the very chamfer it just formed on the part. Guiding the punch chamfer along the die's cylindrical wall made the direct pressed chamfer reliably defect free, at the cost of longer press times and additional tool wear, a trade off the subsequent tool redesign set out to remove.

Axial Dry Press for Cemented Carbide Rods
TECHNOLOGY

A Data Driven Redesign for Productivity and a Defect Free Chamfer

Instead of one die geometry covering every part length, the tooling was split into several variants, each matched to a narrower range of pre widening lengths. Combined with an increased cavity count, which also raised productivity per stroke, this reduced the geometric compromises that had been driving cracks at the pressed chamfer on the broader, one size fits all tooling.

Every change was validated against production data rather than trial parts alone, tracking productivity, defect rates, and cost per part across the full tool life to confirm that a higher output tool and a defect free chamfer held up together at scale, not just in a short qualification run.

Cemented Carbide Rods After Dry Pressing
RESULTS

Higher Productivity, a Defect Free Direct Pressed Chamfer

Results were tracked on real 8mm production orders, not isolated trial batches.

Metric Old Tooling New Tooling
Cavities per tool 5 7
Productivity per stroke +40%
Defect free rate 57.5% 99.7%
Crack rate 33.4% 0.0%
Defect cost index / part −80%

Productivity Gain

  • Cavity count 5 → 7 (+40% per stroke)
  • Defect cost cut by more than 5x
  • No change to article cost otherwise

Defect Free Direct Pressed Chamfer

  • Crack rate: 33.4% → 0.0%
  • Defect free rate: 57.5% → 99.7%
  • Zero cracks across full validation

Scale of Validation

  • Hundreds of production orders tracked
  • Well over a million parts evaluated
  • Results held up across full tool life
PROJECT SUMMARY

From a Tolerated Defect to a Productive, Defect Free Direct Pressed Chamfer

This project demonstrates how a systematic root cause investigation into press position, punch behaviour and tool geometry turned a long tolerated crack defect at the pressed chamfer into a solved engineering problem, without trading away productivity to get there.

By redesigning the tooling around what the data actually showed, rather than around convention, the project raised productivity per stroke by 40%, cut defect costs by up to five times, and made the direct pressed chamfer itself defect free, all validated against real production volumes rather than qualification samples.

Looking to eliminate a persistent defect in your own pressing or forming process? Let's get in touch →