INDUSTRY PROJECT

High-Quality Machining of
Automotive Composite Materials

Process Optimization Six Sigma Trials New Process Implementation

Implementation of a new orbital milling process for high-quality bore holes in combined carbon and glass fibre reinforced automotive structural components, developed through systematic process optimization and Six Sigma trials in cooperation with an automotive OEM and a cutting-tool manufacturer.

CFRP Structural Reinforcement in an Automotive Body-in-White

Industry

Automotive (Structural Components)

Technology

Composite Machining (CFRP/GFRP)

Role

Process Engineer

Status

Implemented

THE CHALLENGE

Beyond Tool Wear: A New Quality Problem

Combining carbon and glass fibres in a single structural component makes for a lightweight, high-performance part, but also for a highly abrasive, inhomogeneous material to machine. Conventional drilling causes tool wear and cutting-edge rounding, resulting in fibre pull-out and fibre protrusion at the bore holes rather than a clean cut.

With over 200 bore holes per vehicle in modern lightweight platforms, these defects currently require costly, time-consuming manual rework in series production. The aim of this process optimization project was to eliminate that manual step entirely by achieving the required hole quality through machining alone.

Hole Entrance and Exit Quality Comparison Under Different Cutting Parameters
ENGINEERING SCOPE

Defining Quality, Then Testing Two Strategies

Since conventional metrics like surface roughness don't capture composite-specific defects, the investigation started by defining the right quality criteria together with the end user.

Experimental Test Setup for Composite Machining Trials

Quality Criteria & Setup

  • Fibre pull-out & protrusion, defined with the end user
  • Evaluated at hole entrance and exit
  • 5-axis HSC machine, SEM tool-wear analysis

Six Sigma Process Trials

  • Axial drilling vs. orbital milling
  • Cutting speeds up to 925 m/min
  • Uncoated vs. CVD-diamond-coated tools

Component Case Study

  • Real automotive structural component
  • 3 diameters (5/8/12 mm)
  • Technological & economic comparison
COOPERATION

A Three-Way Industry Partnership

Clear division of responsibilities between a process engineering partner, an automotive OEM and a cutting-tool manufacturer.

Process Engineering

  • Process Development
  • Six Sigma Trial Execution
  • New Process Implementation

Automotive OEM

  • Quality Criteria Definition
  • Component Specification
  • Industrial Validation

Cutting-Tool Manufacturer

  • Cutting Tool Development
  • Tool Supply
TECHNOLOGY

Why Standard Drilling Falls Short

Across the parameter study, tool wear was surprisingly not the limiting factor: even a new, unworn tool could not achieve the required hole quality when drilling. Fibre pull-out and protrusion occurred from the very first holes, driven by the anisotropy and inhomogeneity of the CFRP/GFRP material itself rather than by cutting-edge degradation.

CVD diamond coatings, reported elsewhere to extend tool life significantly, brought no measurable quality improvement here either. Their larger cutting-edge radius, while good for abrasion resistance, worked against the fine shearing action needed to cut fibres cleanly.

Process Window Showing Bore Holes Achievable Before Fibre Protrusion Exceeds 1 mm
TECHNOLOGY

A Step-Wise Orbital Milling Strategy

Instead of a stationary drill bit, orbital milling moves a smaller-diameter tool on an orbit while advancing axially, here following a step-wise trajectory rather than a continuous helix. This eliminates the stationary tool centre that concentrates stress on the fibres, improves chip evacuation and heat extraction, and lets a single tool produce multiple hole diameters simply by adjusting the orbit radius.

This is the key advantage over drilling: axial drilling needs a dedicated, fixed-diameter tool for every hole size, so producing three different diameters means two tool changes. Orbital milling covers all of them with the same tool, without a single tool change.

The result was a significant improvement in bore hole quality at both entrance and exit compared to drilling. Fibre protrusion at the hole exit remained the most persistent quality issue, with sizeable variation across the parameter set, and is the focus of ongoing work.

Helical Milling Tool Used for Orbital Milling Trials
Process Time Comparison Between Axial Drilling and Orbital Milling
RESULTS

Faster, Higher Quality, and More Productive

Evaluated on a real automotive structural component with 20 bore holes across three diameters, orbital milling proved faster than drilling once tool changes are accounted for, in addition to delivering significantly higher hole quality.

CFRP Component with Machined Bore Holes

Quality Improvement

  • Significantly higher hole quality at entrance
  • Substantially reduced fibre pull-out at exit
  • Achieved without tool coatings

Economic Advantage

  • 37.6 s (drilling) vs. 31.2 s (milling)
  • One tool covers all three diameters — better tool life, no tool change
  • Net gain in productivity, not just tool life

Path to Series Production

  • Reduced need for manual rework
  • Applicable across 200+ holes per vehicle
  • New process implemented
PROJECT SUMMARY

From Process Optimization to Implementation

This project demonstrates how an industry partnership between a process engineering partner, an automotive OEM and a cutting-tool manufacturer turned an open machining challenge into a practically implemented process strategy.

By defining composite-specific quality criteria together with the end user and systematically comparing drilling and orbital milling through Six Sigma trials, the work identified and implemented a process strategy that significantly improves bore hole quality in CFRP/GFRP automotive components while also cutting processing time, directly reducing manual rework in series production.

Looking to improve your own composite machining process? Let's get in touch →